Dear
readers,
When we
read commentaries on recent market movements we can often hear analysts’
comments like “the xxx-risk is already priced in” and such. Despite my
confusion on how those analysts can determine exactly what is “priced in” by
“the market” and what is not, and why they always come up with that after
things happened, I want to try today to reconstruct the happenings at Respol
and see if and to what extend the governmental takeover has been incorporated
into the market price of Repsols shares.
Also in
this recent case analysts were fast with their comments that the
nationalization is already priced in (Nomura on 18.04: On current stock price
level worst case scenario almost already priced in).
Since I
wanted to write this article since a long time, it’s quite retro perspective
now, however I think it might contain valuable lessons for similar cases. The
question whether the market is overreacting quickly or rather slow in pricing
in is especially interesting to me.
For the
valuation I will use a rather simplistic approach: The uncompensated loss of
YPF for Repsol will be priced in, when the market capitalization of Repsol will
be reduced by the amount lost due to the nationalization of YPF.
To
determine this amount lost there are several approaches.
·
Since
YPF was a publicly listed company, one could multiply the prices previous the
nationalization with the numbers of shares lost by Repsol
·
Repsol
claimed compensation for his majority stake from the Argentinian government,
amounting to 10, 5 billion USD, i.e. around 8 billion EUR.
·
Previous to the nationalization Repsol was in
talks with Chinese investors –reportedly Sinopec- wanting to take over the
majority holding for about 10 billion USD (7, 6 billion EUR). Here we have two
willing parties, behaving rational and also the premium for the majority
holding is priced into the transaction.
For this
study I am going to use the third approach, which is close to a recent
transaction comparison. Actually it’s even better, since the companies being compared
are not only similar, but one and the same. Therefore I will take the market
price that both parties agreed on as the fair value of the YPF stake.
On the
following graphic I tried to follow the events and record the loss of market
capitalization, starting from the 11.04.2012 as t=0. [Data from Bloomberg,
lowest price/day].
So as we
can see, so far there is only a loss of around 5 billion till today that is
(mostly) attributable to the nationalization.
So if we
consider the estimates above of 7, 6/8 billion we can see that the loss is
still not fully incorporated.
This is a
reminder to keep a cool head, and calculate first before considering a buy.
To me analysts’
estimates at around 20 EUR seem quite high, however there are a few pessimistic
voices (25/04: JPM 15, 5 Neutral).
Continuing
the time line beyond the 02.05.2012 would probably not make much since, since
we have seen a sharp decline in oil price from then on (120 USD/Barrel to 113,4
closing price on the 04.05.). It would be very difficult to distinguish between
the “pricing in of the nationalization” and the “pricing in of lower spot
prices”.
Edit 16.02.2014:
The final sum agreed on by Argentinian gvmt and Repsol is according to reports 5 bn. EUR. Original compensation sought by Repsol was 10.5 bn. EUR.
The 5 bn. EUR was priced in on the 02.05.2012, so in less than a month, on undiscounted basis.
No comments:
Post a Comment